mirror of
http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git
synced 2026-02-03 21:33:35 +02:00
DOC: fix typos in the documentation files
This fixes several obvious typos in the documentation: s/elvoved/evolved s/performend/performed s/importnat/important s/sharedd/shared s/eveyone/everyone No backport needed.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Willy Tarreau
parent
6f5def3cbd
commit
0c3b212aab
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
A number of contributors are often embarrassed with coding style issues, they
|
||||
don't always know if they're doing it right, especially since the coding style
|
||||
has elvoved along the years. What is explained here is not necessarily what is
|
||||
has evolved along the years. What is explained here is not necessarily what is
|
||||
applied in the code, but new code should as much as possible conform to this
|
||||
style. Coding style fixes happen when code is replaced. It is useless to send
|
||||
patches to fix coding style only, they will be rejected, unless they belong to
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ It is possible to chain a TCP frontend to an HTTP backend. It is pointless if
|
||||
only HTTP traffic is handled. But it may be used to handle several protocols
|
||||
within the same frontend. In this case, the client's connection is first handled
|
||||
as a raw tcp connection before being upgraded to HTTP. Before the upgrade, the
|
||||
content processings are performend on raw data. Once upgraded, data is parsed
|
||||
content processings are performed on raw data. Once upgraded, data is parsed
|
||||
and stored using an internal representation called HTX and it is no longer
|
||||
possible to rely on raw representation. There is no way to go back.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5736,7 +5736,7 @@ HTTP/2 upgrade, applicative streams are distinct and all frontend rules are
|
||||
evaluated systematically on each one. And as said, the first stream, the TCP
|
||||
one, is destroyed, but only after the frontend rules were evaluated.
|
||||
|
||||
There is another importnat point to understand when HTTP processings are
|
||||
There is another important point to understand when HTTP processings are
|
||||
performed from a TCP proxy. While HAProxy is able to parse HTTP/1 in-fly from
|
||||
tcp-request content rules, it is not possible for HTTP/2. Only the HTTP/2
|
||||
preface can be parsed. This is a huge limitation regarding the HTTP content
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
The buffer list API allows one to share a certain amount of buffers between
|
||||
multiple entities, which will each see their own as lists of buffers, while
|
||||
keeping a sharedd free list. The immediate use case is for muxes, which may
|
||||
keeping a shared free list. The immediate use case is for muxes, which may
|
||||
want to allocate up to a certain number of buffers per connection, shared
|
||||
among all streams. In this case, each stream will first request a new list
|
||||
for its own use, then may request extra entries from the free list. At any
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ A small team of trusted developers will receive it and will be able to propose
|
||||
a fix. We usually don't use embargoes and once a fix is available it gets
|
||||
merged. In some rare circumstances it can happen that a release is coordinated
|
||||
with software vendors. Please note that this process usually messes up with
|
||||
eveyone's work, and that rushed up releases can sometimes introduce new bugs,
|
||||
everyone's work, and that rushed up releases can sometimes introduce new bugs,
|
||||
so it's best avoided unless strictly necessary; as such, there is often little
|
||||
consideration for reports that needlessly cause such extra burden, and the best
|
||||
way to see your work credited usually is to provide a working fix, which will
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user