This allows for better compiler errors, where the compiler will state a
copy or move couldn't occur due to the relevant function being deleted.
Previously a compiler would warn about the relevant function not being
accessible (which, while true, isn't as informative as it could be).
Now that we have most of core free of shadowing, we can enable the
warning as an error to catch anything that may be remaining and also
eliminate this class of logic bug entirely.
- This does not actually seem to exist in the real kernel - games reset these automatically.
# Conflicts:
# src/core/hle/service/am/applets/applets.cpp
# src/core/hle/service/filesystem/fsp_srv.cpp
Renames the members to more accurately indicate what they signify.
"OneShot" and "Sticky" are kind of ambiguous identifiers for the reset
types, and can be kind of misleading. Automatic and Manual communicate
the kind of reset type in a clearer manner. Either the event is
automatically reset, or it isn't and must be manually cleared.
The "OneShot" and "Sticky" terminology is just a hold-over from Citra
where the kernel had a third type of event reset type known as "Pulse".
Given the Switch kernel only has two forms of event reset types, we
don't need to keep the old terminology around anymore.
The NVFlinger service is already passed into services that need to
guarantee its lifetime, so the BufferQueue instances will already live
as long as they're needed. Making them std::shared_ptr instances in this
case is unnecessary.
Like the previous changes made to the Display struct, this prepares the
Layer struct for changes to its interface. Given Layer will be given
more invariants in the future, we convert it into a class to better
signify that.
With the display and layer structures relocated to the vi service, we
can begin giving these a proper interface before beginning to properly
support the display types.
This converts the display struct into a class and provides it with the
necessary functions to preserve behavior within the NVFlinger class.
These are more closely related to the vi service as opposed to the
intermediary nvflinger.
This also places them in their relevant subfolder, as future changes to
these will likely result in subclassing to represent various displays
and services, as they're done within the service itself on hardware.
The reasoning for prefixing the display and layer source files is to
avoid potential clashing if two files with the same name are compiled
(e.g. if 'display.cpp/.h' or 'layer.cpp/.h' is added to another service
at any point), which MSVC will actually warn against. This prevents that
case from occurring.
This also presently coverts the std::array introduced within
f45c25aaba back to a std::vector to allow
the forward declaration of the Display type. Forward declaring a type
within a std::vector is allowed since the introduction of N4510
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4510.html) by
Zhihao Yuan.
