Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bunnei
ff3c7c068b hle: kernel: Reimplement KReadableEvent and KWritableEvent. 2021-02-05 14:03:32 -08:00
bunnei
3f942c01f0 hle: kernel: Rename WritableEvent to KWritableEvent. 2021-02-05 14:00:36 -08:00
bunnei
e86a7e3691 hle: kernel: Rename ReadableEvent to KReadableEvent. 2021-02-05 14:00:36 -08:00
bunnei
64c5631579 service: vi: Implement CloseLayer.
- Needed for Undertale.
2020-01-04 00:45:06 -05:00
bunnei
9046d4a548
kernel: Replace usage of boost::intrusive_ptr with std::shared_ptr for kernel objects. (#3154)
* kernel: Replace usage of boost::intrusive_ptr with std::shared_ptr for kernel objects.

- See https://github.com/citra-emu/citra/pull/4710 for details.
2019-11-24 20:15:51 -05:00
bunnei
b0ab803ce8 kernel: events: Remove ResetType::Automatic.
- This does not actually seem to exist in the real kernel - games reset these automatically.

# Conflicts:
#	src/core/hle/service/am/applets/applets.cpp
#	src/core/hle/service/filesystem/fsp_srv.cpp
2019-11-03 04:22:45 -05:00
David Marcec
4d220964df Deglobalize System: Vi 2019-09-22 16:38:03 +10:00
Lioncash
a47aaa7f1b core/kernel/object: Rename ResetType enum members
Renames the members to more accurately indicate what they signify.
"OneShot" and "Sticky" are kind of ambiguous identifiers for the reset
types, and can be kind of misleading. Automatic and Manual communicate
the kind of reset type in a clearer manner. Either the event is
automatically reset, or it isn't and must be manually cleared.

The "OneShot" and "Sticky" terminology is just a hold-over from Citra
where the kernel had a third type of event reset type known as "Pulse".
Given the Switch kernel only has two forms of event reset types, we
don't need to keep the old terminology around anymore.
2019-05-18 15:52:51 -04:00
Lioncash
90528f1326 service/nvflinger: Store BufferQueue instances as regular data members
The NVFlinger service is already passed into services that need to
guarantee its lifetime, so the BufferQueue instances will already live
as long as they're needed. Making them std::shared_ptr instances in this
case is unnecessary.
2019-02-21 22:09:46 -05:00
Lioncash
fd15730767 service/vi/vi_layer: Convert Layer struct into a class
Like the previous changes made to the Display struct, this prepares the
Layer struct for changes to its interface. Given Layer will be given
more invariants in the future, we convert it into a class to better
signify that.
2019-02-21 12:13:09 -05:00
Lioncash
fa4dc2cf42 service/nvflinger: Move display specifics over to vi_display
With the display and layer structures relocated to the vi service, we
can begin giving these a proper interface before beginning to properly
support the display types.

This converts the display struct into a class and provides it with the
necessary functions to preserve behavior within the NVFlinger class.
2019-02-21 12:13:04 -05:00
Lioncash
8d5d369b54 service/nvflinger: Relocate definitions of Layer and Display to the vi service
These are more closely related to the vi service as opposed to the
intermediary nvflinger.

This also places them in their relevant subfolder, as future changes to
these will likely result in subclassing to represent various displays
and services, as they're done within the service itself on hardware.

The reasoning for prefixing the display and layer source files is to
avoid potential clashing if two files with the same name are compiled
(e.g. if 'display.cpp/.h' or 'layer.cpp/.h' is added to another service
at any point), which MSVC will actually warn against. This prevents that
case from occurring.

This also presently coverts the std::array introduced within
f45c25aaba back to a std::vector to allow
the forward declaration of the Display type. Forward declaring a type
within a std::vector is allowed since the introduction of N4510
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4510.html) by
Zhihao Yuan.
2019-02-19 18:27:16 -05:00