- The current implementation for modals is provided by fomantic UI.
- This patch introduces a new implementation that relies on the `<dialog>` element to provide modal, whereby the heavy lifting is done by the browser.
- This implementation is considerably simpler, accessible (although untested) and lightweight. It is capable of replacing fomantic UI's modal implementation + our dimmer implementation (~2k lines of code and CSS).[^1] As a first step the empty content modal is migrated.
- This brings in the CSS needed to display `<dialog>` and a helper function that hides some boilerplate code that's needed to show `<dialog>` as a modal.
- Add a E2E test that shows the modal's cancel and approve button works.
[^1]: The heavy work has already been done by me in a local branch, but reviewing that gigantic patch in one PR is not doable.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8859
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7822
* Fix signaturebox's background breaking out of hashbox and thus breaking it's rounded corners
* Fix a bug where an extra right margin was applied to signbox's avatar on pull request overview by unrelated rule
* Untangle hashbox's CSS from .label - it was not a good partnership between them. Some extra properties, some that we had to override
* Move CSS out of "repo.css" to a separate file - it's clearly not only related to repos
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8721
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
In similar vein of forgejo/forgejo#7416
- Fomantic's tab module is responsible for showing the right content when a tab is clicked upon. Most notably the Write/Preview tabs on the comment editor.
- Remove it and replace the javascript with our own function that is able to provide everything Forgejo needs.
- Replace the CSS with our own bare minimum CSS.
- No functionality or visual is affected by this replacement.
- E2E test added.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8587
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4760
* some refactoring
* move rules out of repo.css to a new module
* simplify selectors by omitting .list: it is now only used to style the list itself, they're still precise enough in scope of .user-cards
* apply wrap/ellipsis to cards' content. Done via CSS to avoid spamming gt-ellipsis in the template
* prevent cards with long content from taking horizontal space from other cards
* prevent such cards from causing horizontal overflow on mobile
* prevent varying card height, it doesn't look good even with text wrapping
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6799
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Careful removal of unused classes and rules from editable CSS. One class was used once in the UI and could have been easily replaced, others were only used in a devtest page.
Removed completely:
* pink
* olive
* violet
* background
Removed partially:
* blue
Some of them are also present in generated Fomantic code, but it's not possible to remove them easily here.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7898
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Fomantic's dimmer module is responsible for dimming the page and make some element the primary focus on the page (e.g. modal). This module is only used by Fomantic's modal module.
- Remove it and replace the javascript with our own `Dimmer` class that is able to provide Fomantic's modal module with everything it needs.
- Replace the CSS with our own bare minimum CSS.
- No functionality or visual is affected by this replacement.
- E2E test added.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7416
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6459.
Usually it's quite hard to have inputs with balanced size that works for both desktop and mobile: it's either too large or too small for one of them. I think this can be a solution for this new element.
I tried it locally, it feels good on a phone. There's likely one downside which is that the switch will still be larger on touch devices even when they're wide, like on tablets. I think it can be resolved separately at some point. It isn't a problem on small devices because usually these elements go on separate rows.
## Preview
This change only affects touch devices.
|Before|After|
|-|-|
|||
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6546
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Confine the search menu to be at most the width of the page, or 80% of
the viewport width, whichever is smaller. To do this, introduce a new
`--container-width` variable for the descendant elements of
`.ui.container` to be able to access.
Also update the relevant e2e test: add a long 'lorem ipsum' page, add a
search for it, parameterize the width.
UX/Translation changes:
- new teams: remove redundant tooltips that don't add meaningful information
- move general information to table fieldset
- new teams: rename "general" to "custom" access for clarity
- new teams: show labels beside options on mobile
Accessibility:
- semantic form elements allow easier navigation (fieldset, mostly)
- improve better labelling of new teams table
- fix accessibility scan issues
- TODO: the parts that "disable" form elements were not yet touched and
are not really accessible to screenreaders
Technical:
- replace two JavaScript solutions with one CSS standard
- implement a simpler grid (.simple-grid)
- simplify markup
- remove some webhook settings specific CSS
Testing:
- check more form content for accessibility issues
- but exclude tooltips from the scan :(
- reuse existing form tests from previous PR
Cherry-pick of 2ced31e81d adapted to Forgejo releases UI.
Percentage-based `border-radius` [creates undesirable
ellipse](https://jsfiddle.net/silverwind/j9ko5wnt/4/) on non-square
content. Instead, use pixel value and use same wording `full` like
tailwind does, but increast to 99999px over their 9999px.
(cherry picked from commit 2ced31e81dd9e45659660c1abff529d0192fd8ed)
This is a very old bug with the bottom border-radiuses not being there
and the `:has` selector now makes it possible to cleanly solve it. It
affects all header+segment boxes, which there are many throughout the
UI:
<img width="1017" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-23 at 20 47 21"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/870fe352-cc38-4bd6-bfe6-9fe8c3066f92">
(cherry picked from commit 3f19a6334575e1d2849999e8339f1b515cefaf1a)
Likely still some unnecessary CSS but any combinations with the `ui
list` classes are covered. There was only on instance of `horizontal
list` which I removed. It was this part of the commit page:
<img width="396" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/c49ec4f5-93c3-41d6-a907-cdbedf8abc44">
(cherry picked from commit 649aada3664f5adccdaecc7dd24b8252ae070220)
Create a new `issue-navbar` class specifically for this bar, previous
class used in many places and I thought I had them all removed, but not
this one.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30226
(cherry picked from commit 944c76e78423405a33450eb3d07cd2b772f4a81c)
Another pure CSS module. Some styling is part of the `form` module which
will likely follow next.
(cherry picked from commit ff334749f58c71980ec19143bc21c0a799074b30)
Conflicts:
- web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
Resolved the conflict by manually applying the Gitea change.
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30185, regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30162.
The checkboxes were unclickable because the label was positioned over
the checkbox with `padding`. Now it uses `margin` so the checkbox itself
will be clickable in all cases.
Secondly, I changed the for/id linking to also add missing `for`
attributes when `id` is present. The other way around (only `for`
present) is currently not handled and I think there are likey no
occurences in the code and introducing new non-generated `id`s might
cause problems elsewhere if we do, so I skipped on that.
(cherry picked from commit 640850e15f56bbe01f5d8ea407f99c79dc38457e)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30143, regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29920.
We have `.button` on the repo page, but on the branch page it's a
`.btn`. Eventually we should find a solution to have a single button
class but until then this solution should be acceptable.
(cherry picked from commit c85619b82d19a928cb219eba3f38473928b29b0c)
Of note is the CSS has references to "floating label" and "transparent
label" but I could not find those anywhere in the code. They are related
to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/3939, but I think these have
long been removed.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 643e6b09587a89dba1f6b58ae21e5d0e7cfd9776)
Conflicts:
web_src/css/base.css
trivial context conflict
